News and Media

Anti-doping news

Anti-Doping Commission Meeting in Lausanne

An Anti-Doping Commission meeting has taken place during the WADA ADO Symposium yesterday in Lausanne, Switzerland. Among other topics the members discussed the -latest experiences in the application of the new IWF Anti-Doping Policy -Test Distribution Plan in the light of the WADA Technical Document for Sport Specific Analysis -future cooperation with the selected ADOs The ADC clearly focuses with WADA on protecting the clean athletes and enforcing the new Anti-Doping Rules, especially the rules applicable to the

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

The IWF reports that sample A of Mr. Filev Ivaylo, Mr. Nazif Ferdi, Ms. Maneva Milka, Mr. Urumov Vladimir, Mr. Muradov Asen, Mr. Markov Ivan, Mr. Enev Stoyan, Mr. Minchev Dian, Mr. Demirev Demir, Ms. Nguen Nadezhda – Mey, Ms. Ivanova Maya BUL has returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for stanozolol. As a consequence, the athletes are provisionally suspended in view of a potential anti-doping rule violation. In any case where it is determined – after a B sample analysis, a hearing or an appeal – that the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the relevant decision will also be published. The IWF will not make any further comment on the cases until they are

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

The IWF reports that sample A of Mr. Muhammet Dovranov TKM has returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for metenolone. As a consequence, the athlete is provisionally suspended in view of a potential anti-doping rule violation. In any case where it is determined – after a B sample analysis, a hearing or an appeal – that the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the relevant decision will also be published. The IWF will not make any further comment on the case until it is

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

The IWF reports that sample A of Ms. Ya-Li Zeng from TPE has returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for hydrochlorothiazide. As a consequence, the athlete is provisionally suspended in view of a potential anti-doping rule violation. In any case where it is determined – after a B sample analysis, a hearing or an appeal – that the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the relevant decision will also be published. The IWF will not make any further comment on the case until it is