News and Media

Archive from 2014

Host Thailand dominates first days of University Worlds

In the women’s events Thailand’s prominent and world-medalled athletes stole the show from the 48kg up to the 58kg categories, while the men’s first and second days produced Thai, Chinese and French winners, alternatingly. On home turf, Panida KHAMSRI, Kittima SUTHANAN and Sukanya SRISURAT were irresistible, as was Witoon MINGMOON (56kg). China’s YU Tao proved to be the best in the men’s 62kg and – at the end of a nice and close battle – France’s Bernardin KINGUE MATAM triumphed in the

4th World University Championships opened in Chiang Mai

In a spectacular Opening Ceremony the Governor of Chiang Mai Province opened the 4th FISU World University Weightlifting Championships today. The event hosted by the North-Chiang Mai University in the city with great traditions of weightlifting welcomes competitors from 28 countries. The kickoff of the Championships coincided with HM King Bumibhol Adulyadej’s birthday which the participants were proud to celebrate together with the hosts. In the first category, Thailand’s World Championship silver and bronze medallist Panida Khamsri excelled winning the Women’s 48kg ahead of Japanese and Turkish contestants. Follow the WUWC2014 Chiang Mai on our

IWF represented at ASOIF and IOC meetings

Two important Workshops took place in Lausanne with the involvement of the IWF; - a Good Governance Follow-up Workshop for the IFs held under the auspices of ASOIF and CIES; - and an IOC Workshop on Integrity in Sports. Both provided interesting and practical conclusions for the participating 27 Olympic International Federations, among those the IWF, which was represented by Attila Ádámfi, Director General and Anikó Németh-Móra, Director. On the following day, a Debrief meeting was held with the IFs and the IOC Sports Department at the Olympic Museum to summarize the experiences of the 2014 Nanjing Youth Olympic Games and help future organisers with the wealth of knowhow offered by the participating International Federations. The IWF delegates also took the opportunity to have discussions with ASOIF and various IOC

Weightlifting coach banned for attempted trafficking of steroids

Drug Free Sport New Zealand welcomes the six-year ban from all sport handed down to a weightlifting coach who admitted offering steroids to an up-and-coming young athlete. The New Zealand Sports Tribunal today released its decision in the case of weightlifting coach, Daniel Milne, for attempted trafficking and possessing a prohibited substance. Drug Free Sport New Zealand chief executive, Graeme Steel, applauds the lengthy ban and says it serves as a warning to coaches who encourage or assist with doping. “Coaches are there to support and inspire athletes, not to drag them into the mire of cheating through drug use. It’s unacceptable for a coach to compromise an athlete’s integrity, health and sporting career in this way and I’m pleased the Tribunal has recognised this by delivering a tough sanction,” Mr Steel says. The Tribunal’s decision notes that the young athlete “should have been receiving mentoring and support” from his coach and should never have been “encouraged to undermine the tenets of true sportsmanship.” Drug Free Sport New Zealand began an investigation in 2013 after the then-teenage weightlifter approached Olympic Weightlifting New Zealand (OWNZ) to say he’d been offered steroids and testosterone tablets by Mr Milne. The young athlete said that he was shocked when Mr Milne showed him a vial of liquid, a needle and tablets at a party. Mr Milne told him he could show him how to use the “juice” which would improve his chances of breaking a New Zealand weightlifting record. The athlete told Mr Milne he was not interested and went on to report the incident. Mr Milne initially denied the allegations, but ultimately admitted two anti-doping rule violations, namely possessing and attempted trafficking (selling, giving, delivering or distributing) a prohibited substance. Mr Steel says the young athlete’s courage in coming forward to report Mr Milne is admirable. “It takes enormous strength of character to come forward to report someone in a position of authority, such as a coach. This young athlete is to be commended for his bravery and in my view he’s a role model for clean sport. I hope other athletes will be inspired by his conviction to do the right thing and out someone involved in doping.” Mr Steel says Mr Milne’s actions were clearly calculated and violated the spirit of sport, but he deserved credit for admitting the charges, rather than denying them. “It seems clear that Mr Milne’s change of heart resulted directly from his return to the strong family values he was brought up with, Mr Steel says. The Tribunal decision notes that Mr Milne was “contrite and ashamed of letting down himself, his family and others around him”. The Tribunal also recognised that Mr Milne gave “years of positive and constructive effort” to weightlifting, but “lost focus and sound judgement” which resulted in the offending. Mr Milne’s ban means he will not be allowed to be involved in any kind of sport for the six years of his ban, either as a competitor, coach or trainer. Read the full decision of the Sports Tribunal here. Source: Drug Free Sport

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

The IWF reports that sample A of Ms. BEGAJ Romela from ALB has returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for stanozolol. As a consequence, the athlete is provisionally suspended in view of a potential anti-doping rule violation. In any case where it is determined – after a B sample analysis, a hearing or an appeal – that the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the relevant decision will also be published. The IWF will not make any further comment on the case until it is

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

The IWF reports that sample A of Ms. HWA RI Jong from PRK has returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for clenbuterol. As a consequence, the athlete is provisionally suspended in view of a potential anti-doping rule violation. In any case where it is determined – after a B sample analysis, a hearing or an appeal – that the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the relevant decision will also be published. The IWF will not make any further comment on the case until it is